��������Ƶ

A Trade mark co-existence agreement lets two companies legally use similar brand names or logos without suing each other. These agreements are common in the Netherlands when businesses discover they share similar trademarks but serve different markets or regions.

Under Dutch trademark law, these contracts spell out exactly how each company can use their mark - including which products, services, or territories are allowed. It's a practical solution that helps businesses avoid costly legal battles while protecting their brand identities. The Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) recognizes these agreements as valid ways to resolve potential trademark conflicts.

Consider a Trade mark co-existence agreement when you discover another company using a similar trademark to yours in the Netherlands or Benelux region. This is especially relevant if both businesses can operate without confusing customers - like a "Delta" airline and "Delta" furniture company.

Time is crucial here - it's best to negotiate these agreements early, before disputes escalate into costly legal battles. The agreement becomes particularly valuable when expanding into new markets or product lines where trademark overlap might occur. Many Dutch companies use these agreements during mergers, acquisitions, or when entering international markets where similar brands already exist.

• Standard territorial agreements: Define specific geographic boundaries where each company can use their trademark within the Netherlands and Benelux region
• Product-specific agreements: Limit trademark use to distinct product categories or market segments
• Hybrid co-existence agreements: Combine both territorial and product restrictions while including special provisions for online presence
• Time-limited agreements: Set specific duration periods or phase-out terms for trademark usage
• Cross-border agreements: Address trademark use across multiple EU jurisdictions while maintaining Dutch law compliance

• Trademark Owners: Companies or individuals who have registered trademarks in the Netherlands and need to resolve potential conflicts
• IP Lawyers: Draft and negotiate the co-existence agreements, ensuring compliance with Dutch and EU trademark laws
• Corporate Legal Teams: Review and manage trademark co-existence agreements as part of broader IP strategy
• Benelux Office for IP: Records and maintains trademark registrations affected by these agreements
• Business Development Teams: Identify potential trademark conflicts during market expansion or product launches

• Trademark Details: Gather complete registration information for both trademarks, including registration numbers and dates with the Benelux IP Office
• Market Analysis: Document each company's current and planned product lines, services, and territories
• Usage Parameters: Define exact terms for how each party can use their mark, including any design, color, or size restrictions
• Dispute Resolution: Outline specific procedures for handling future conflicts under Dutch law
• Quality Control: Establish standards for maintaining brand reputation and preventing customer confusion
• Documentation Review: Our platform generates comprehensive agreements that include all these elements automatically

• Party Details: Full legal names, registration numbers, and addresses of both trademark owners
• Trademark Specifications: Detailed description of both marks, including registration numbers and classes
• Territorial Scope: Clear definition of geographic boundaries within Netherlands and Benelux
• Usage Terms: Specific conditions for trademark use, including any restrictions or limitations
• Duration & Termination: Agreement length and conditions for ending the arrangement
• Dispute Resolution: Dutch law-compliant procedures for handling conflicts
• Governing Law: Explicit statement that Dutch law governs the agreement
• Signatures: Authorized representative signatures and company seals where required

A Trade mark co-existence agreement differs significantly from a Trademark License Agreement in several key ways. While both deal with trademark rights, their purposes and applications are quite distinct in Dutch law.

• Purpose: Co-existence agreements resolve potential conflicts between similar marks, while license agreements grant permission to use someone else's trademark
• Relationship Type: Co-existence creates boundaries between independent parties, while licensing establishes a controlled relationship between owner and user
• Financial Terms: Co-existence typically involves no royalties or fees, whereas licensing usually requires payment for trademark use
• Control Level: Co-existence maintains separate brand identities, while licensing gives the owner ongoing quality control rights
• Duration Impact: Co-existence agreements usually last indefinitely, while license agreements often have specific term limits and renewal conditions